Jeffrey Sipprell, UCLA M Arch II

This differential thickness was conceptualized in three very basic variables - structurally from the ground up, porosity at the local aggregation, and as a gradient density across the whole assembly (more compact at the entry, more open towards the end). The thicknesses defined in the early exericse were then assigned to each localized area based on the relationships between the variables (the entry condition near the bottom would receive maximum thickness while the top of the final open pod would receive very minimal thickness). The thicknesses were then blended and smoothed together to create one over-arching differential thickness that came to define some very interesting spaces and forms.

Of these, the most interesting areas are where there is maximum thickness. The thickness in the entry area was stretched beyond the parameters set up in the initial exercise to explore issues of partitioning and atmosphere (here defined as very heavy and dripping), particularly in contrast with the very open spaces that occur at the end of the aggregation. Although this was studied purely in terms of mass, it could be interesting in future endeavors to mine the thickness as an issue of layers or manifolds, particularly in areas where the layers begin to fold back on to themselves – an interior surface becoming an exterior one.

Though a frustrating process at times, the minimal surface studies became very interesting when considering architectural implications. But there is an inherent danger in losing touch with the rigor of the initial exercises when beginning to explore issues of space and volume. The thickness strategies I think were a noble attempt to continue that rigor at the beginning, but perhaps lost some of its intent when there was a scramble in the end to explore ideas of atmosphere. With any luck I’ll get to further the investigation this Fall with David again as it appears the minimal surface will be the crux of his design studio.

Photos of final models to follow shortly. For now, enjoy the drawings.

Full Board (6.7 mb)

Board 1 (559 kb)
Board 2 (659 kb)
Board 3 (424 kb)
Board 4 (2.1 mb)
Board 5 (3.3 mb)